Corva v. United Services Automobile Association

108 A.D. 2d 631 (1985)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P was a passenger in an auto when it collided with a case owned by Sabia. P retained a law firm. Sabia was insured by USAA and USAA retained a law firm. The matter was settled for $15,000 because USAA's attorney represented that the policy limits were $15,000. P seeks compensatory and punitive damages. Both USAA and the law firm cross-complained against P's law firm in that it was negligent in not verifying the policy limits. P's law firm moved to dismiss these cross-claims, and the motion was granted. Ds appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.