This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The parties own adjacent parcels of real estate. Davis (P) was the owner of the dominant estate, and Bruk (D) was the owner of the servient estate. P sued D to prevent D from obstructing in various ways P's right of way across D's land to the Town Road and the seashore. D counterclaimed for damages against P for unlawfully widening the right of way to the Town Road beyond its legal width. D's counterclaim was denied, but the trial court allowed a relocation of the right of way on a second pass of the issue. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.