This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

W alleges that she is the wife of H and that Eli Lilly (D) manufactured Parnon. W alleged that H made use of Parnon in the course of his work and as a result of exposure sustained severe bodily injuries. W alleged a loss of consortium and that D was responsible as it failed to properly warn about Parnon. D demurred on that ground that no cause of action was stated. The demurrer was sustained, and W appealed after she refused to amend the complaint.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.