This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Tonawanda (D) refused to answer interrogatories on grounds that the answers were already in depositions and that P was not entitled to duplication. P requested the use of depositions to be read into evidence at trial in lieu of D's answers. P moved to compel D's answers to the interrogatories.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.