Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Mcdonnell Douglas Corp.,
532 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1976)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Eastern (P) contracted with McDonnell (D) to purchase jets. The contract took into account the Defense Production Act; the government could issue orders to manufacturers to give priority to military production. Instead of invoking the DPA provisions, the government made offers to manufacturers they just couldn't refuse; to give the U.S. priority or formal directives would be issued. Deliveries to P were delayed because of this back-door arm-twisting. P sued to obtain damages from D for the late deliveries. The trial court awarded P damages. The trial court found in part that the notice requirement under 2-607 was inapplicable to delivery delays of the type experienced herein because a seller necessarily had notice of such a contract violation. The court held that 2-607 was to inform the seller of hidden defects in his performance. D appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner