End Line Investors, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

2018 WL 3231649 (2018)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Jaffe & Asher entered into discussions with D about performing Wells Fargo's consumer debt collection work in New York and New Jersey. Jaffe & Asher maintained only a small office in New Jersey that did not meet D's audit standards. The discussions were with Whitlock, an employee of D, who represented that D would immediately begin placing New York consumer debt collection accounts if Jaffe opened a New Jersey office that met D's audit standards. Relying on these representations, Jaffe leased office space in New Jersey and incurred other expenses in bringing that office into compliance with D's audit requirements. On May 23, 2013, Jaffe signed a Legal Services Agreement and that same day D began placing collection accounts with Jaffe. D did not place all of its existing New Jersey consumer debt collection accounts with Jaffe, nor did it place all future New Jersey collection accounts with them. P is the assignee of Jaffe's claims against D. P sued D for breach of contract related to the alleged Oral Agreement, promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. D moved for judgment on the pleadings.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.