Ernst And Ernst v. Hochfelder

425 U.S. 185 (1976)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Hochfelder (P), a customer of First Securities Company of Chicago, lost money investing in a fraudulent scheme perpetrated by the bank's president. P sought damages under a negligence theory against Ernst and Ernst (D) for their failure to discover the scheme after performing an audit of the bank. The district court dismissed the case on the ground that negligence alone was insufficient to maintain a suit under 10b-5. The Court of Appeals reversed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.