Ernst And Ernst v. Hochfelder
425 U.S. 185 (1976)
Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Hochfelder (P), a customer of First Securities Company of Chicago, lost money investing in a fraudulent scheme perpetrated by the bank's president. P sought damages under a negligence theory against Ernst and Ernst (D) for their failure to discover the scheme after performing an audit of the bank. The district court dismissed the case on the ground that negligence alone was insufficient to maintain a suit under 10b-5. The Court of Appeals reversed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner