Fiege v. Boehm,
210 Md. 352, 123 A 2d 316 (1956)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Boehm (P) became pregnant and believed, in good faith, that Fiege (D) was the father; P threatened D with a suit in bastardy. In response, D promised to pay for the birth expenses and make support payments for the raising of the child as long as P would not institute legal proceedings. D made payments under the agreement but stopped when blood tests revealed that he was not the father. D prevailed at a subsequent trial on the charges of bastardy by the state. D was found not guilty on Landsteiner blood grouping tests. D had type O blood, and P had type B. The child had type A. A physician testified at trial that on the basis of the blood tests, D could not have been the father as it was impossible for an O-B mating to result in a type A child. P then sued for $2,415,80 to enforce the agreement for support in civil court. The jury found that D was liable to P. D appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner