Fiege v. Boehm,

210 Md. 352, 123 A 2d 316 (1956)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Boehm (P) became pregnant and believed, in good faith, that Fiege (D) was the father; P threatened D with a suit in bastardy. In response, D promised to pay for the birth expenses and make support payments for the raising of the child as long as P would not institute legal proceedings. D made payments under the agreement but stopped when blood tests revealed that he was not the father. D prevailed at a subsequent trial on the charges of bastardy by the state. D was found not guilty on Landsteiner blood grouping tests. D had type O blood, and P had type B. The child had type A. A physician testified at trial that on the basis of the blood tests, D could not have been the father as it was impossible for an O-B mating to result in a type A child. P then sued for $2,415,80 to enforce the agreement for support in civil court. The jury found that D was liable to P. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.