Finley v. Teeter Stone, Inc.

248 A.2d 106 (1968)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Finley (P) owned land next to Teeter Stone's (D) quarry. D had operated the quarry since 1958. The quarry pit has been gradually enlarged since that time such that it extends virtually to the border of P's land and a depth of 80 feet. D kept the excavation dry by continually pumping out the water that accumulated in its pit. This resulted in a drawdown of water table so that there was now a shallow cone of depression reaching under P's land. This resulted in sinkholes on 35 acres of P's land, and P had evidence that his land had been substantially damaged as a result of the sinkholes. The trial judge directed a verdict to D and granted a judgment for costs. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.