Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Morgan

536 N.E.2d 587 (1989)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Morgan (D) purchased a new car from a Lincoln Mercury dealer. D financed the car through Ford Motor Credit (P). D drove the car for 11,500 miles over eighteen months and experienced a number of problems with the quality. The worst complaint was that if left unattended, the transmission would shift from park to reverse. D started to have financial difficulties and missed their November and December payments. D then hid the car and continued to do so two months after the court issued a surrender order. The car was eventually surrendered but it was a total wreck. P sought recovery of $2,628.67 and D counterclaimed for fraud and deceit, violation of unfair and deceptive trade practices and breach of express and implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The jury found that the dealer had knowingly made false representations to D. The trial court heard the other complaints and found that D was not entitled to damages on the other two counts. The court entered judgment for D on P's complaint and for D on each of the counterclaims. D was not entitled to affirmative recovery against P. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.