This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ds thought it would be really neat to hurl large landscaping rocks at vehicles traveling on the Beltway. A number of people were injured, and significant damage was done to may vehicles. D was apprehended and charged with a laundry list of crimes. D was found guilty of a laundry list of crimes and given sentences totally 39 years. D appealed, and the Court of Special Appeals reversed and remanded for resentencing two of the malicious destruction of property counts worth less than $300 but otherwise affirmed all the other convictions. The trial court instructed the jury on the theory of transferred intent; the state of mind which one has when about to commit a crime upon one persons is considered by law to exist and to be equally applicable although the intended act affects another person. The judge instructed the jury that if D acted with intent to disable drivers; that intent could be transferred to the passengers. The appeals court addressed this issue of transferred intent and held that it did not apply. This appeal was taken.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.