This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Pennsylvania Tire and Martin's Tire entered into a contract whereby the former agreed to deliver tires to the latter for resale at prices and terms fixed by the latter. The contract was termed a consignment with the title expressly being reserved with Pennsylvania. Monthly inventory reports were required, but there was no provision for any sort of segregating or earmarking the tires. Martin's filed bankruptcy. Pennsylvania filed a petition for reclamation asserting that the transaction was a consignment. The trial court ruled for Pennsylvania and Fowler appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.