Freddo v. State
155 S.W. 170 (1913)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Freddo (D) was 19 years of age and employed at a railroad company. Higginbotham was six years older than D and was taller and outweighed D by 30 lbs. Higginbotham had called D a son of a bitch. D without meaning offense asked Higginbotham to stop calling him that. Higginbotham repeated the saying to D. D was noticeably upset by the use of those words, and even other sought out Higginbotham and told him to stop. D and Higginbotham were working together when an oil spill found Higginbotham calling D names again. D then seized a steel bar and hit Higginbotham with it because D thought that he was coming after him, so he hit him. D was indicted for murder in the first degree and found guilty of second-degree murder. D contends that he should have only been found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. D appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner