Freddo v. State

155 S.W. 170 (1913)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Freddo (D) was 19 years of age and employed at a railroad company. Higginbotham was six years older than D and was taller and outweighed D by 30 lbs. Higginbotham had called D a son of a bitch. D without meaning offense asked Higginbotham to stop calling him that. Higginbotham repeated the saying to D. D was noticeably upset by the use of those words, and even other sought out Higginbotham and told him to stop. D and Higginbotham were working together when an oil spill found Higginbotham calling D names again. D then seized a steel bar and hit Higginbotham with it because D thought that he was coming after him, so he hit him. D was indicted for murder in the first degree and found guilty of second-degree murder. D contends that he should have only been found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.