Freeman v. Decio

584 F.2d 186 (7th Cir. 1978)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Corporate insiders, Decio, Kaufman, and Mandell (Ds) made a profit off of trading their corporate stock (Skyline) based on inside information. Their sales were in excess of $10 million and with their knowledge that Skyline was overstating its earnings. Freeman (P) claims that the insiders owed strict fiduciary duties to shareholders and gained a profit by virtue of their official positions. P also claimed that besides the sales they gifted over $4 million while knowing that earnings would decline. P claims that the insiders should be disgorged and that they should return the profits to shareholders. Both P and D agreed that there was no Indiana precedent regarding this issue. P wants the courts to adopt the Diamond holding to resolve this matter. The district court held that P failed to state a cause of action. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.