Freese v. Fdic

837 F.Supp. 22 (D.N.H. 1993)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D was appointed receiver and liquidating agent for New Hampshire Savings Bank. D issued an Order of Investigation to determine whether any valid claims existed against the Bank's former officers and directors; whether sufficient assets existed to pursue any potential claims against them; and whether the FDIC should seek to freeze or attach any of their assets. D issued administrative subpoenas duces tecum to Freese (Ps) and other former officers and directors of the New Hampshire Savings Bank. Ps sued to have the subpoenas voided in that D lacked the authority to seek personal financial information, that the information sought was not relevant to the investigation of the New Hampshire Savings Bank and the scope of the subpoenas were overly broad and burdensome. D filed motions seeking summary enforcement of the subpoenas and a dismissal of the complaints.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.