This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Frummer (P) was a registered guest at the Hilton in London (D). While taking a shower, he slipped and fell and sustained serious injury. P charged D with liability under three theories; not providing a rubber shower mat after a specific request, failing to install grab bars, and not constructing the tub to minimize the risk of falling. D claimed that P was at fault from his own carelessness and offered expert evidence that it had done all that was reasonable or that was required under a reasonable standard. D won the verdict and P moved to set it aside and grant a new trial.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.