Gentile v. State Bar Of Nevada

501 U.S. 1030 (1991)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

The police kept cocaine and traveler's checks used in undercover operations in a vault. The items were stolen, and just about everyone was under suspicion. Eventually, the owner of the vault was indicted. Almost immediately upon discovery of the theft, the parties involved went to the press. The case began to be tried in the press from various inflammatory statements made by both sides. The owner was eventually tried and acquitted of the charges against him. Disciplinary proceedings were then brought against his attorney, Gentile for violation of Nevada Supreme Court Rule 177 (a verbatim copy of ABA Model Rule 3.6). Gentile was found in violation. The state supreme court affirmed, and the Supreme Court granted review.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.