This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P and D agreed to the sale of jewelry. A memorandum of sale was prepared and signed by both parties. It stated that P was purchasing Indian jewelry for $500.00, but if it was unacceptable, P could return it at his option for a refund of $440.00. The memo was silent as to the amount of time P had to return the items. The court allowed D to testify to a contemporaneous oral agreement that the jewelry had to be returned by the following Monday. Since P did not contact D until that next Wednesday D refused to refund the $440.00 when P indicated the jewelry was unacceptable.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.