Giant Food Incorporated v. Satterfield

603 A.2d 877 (1992)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P stopped in D's store to purchase a few items. As she walked through the produce section, she slipped on a puddle of water and fell to the floor, landing on her left side. P alleges that the pain she feels in her shoulders, neck, elbow, and fingers is a direct result of her fall. A former employee of D testified that, when the produce stands were cleaned, the drains would occasionally back up, and water would collect in puddles on the floor. P sued D in negligence from a slip and fall while in D's store. The jury found against D and awarded P$2,500 for past medical expenses and $40,000 in non-economic compensatory damages. P appealed. D avers that the trial court committed reversible error by denying d's request for a particular jury instruction. D's request followed a statement made by P's counsel during closing argument about computing damages for pain and suffering on a per diem basis. D cross-appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.