This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D acquired a house through the foreclosure of a mortgage when the mortgagee abandoned the property because of extensive termite infestation and damage and defaulted on his mortgage obligation. D's agent had been informed through a termite service that the property in question was infested with termites and appeared to have extensive damage. The service recommended that a qualified building inspector assess the damage. D chose to ignore the recommendation and instead hired the service to treat the termites and '[shore] up' the visible damage to the house. D's selling agent showed P a single area where termite damage had occurred and assured P that this was the only termite-damaged area and that all necessary repairs and treatments had been made to eliminate the termite problem. The agent knew that this was a complete fabrication. D and the agent concealed and suppressed all evidence of termite damage. The purchase agreement recited that the transaction was 'based upon [P's] personal inspection or investigation of the Property and not upon any representation or warranties of condition by D or its agent.' The agreement further provided that the property was 'sold strictly in 'AS IS' condition. D does not make any warranties regarding the condition of the property at the time of sale and thereafter.' P bought the property and then sued to recover damages from the termite infestation. The court dismissed the suit. P appealed, and the appeal was removed to this court.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.