Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stanford Associates.

100 Wash.2d 476, 670P.2d 648 (1983)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Goodman, a real estate salesman, sold an apartment building to DDS Associates. The building needed renovations and Goodman advised DDS that he was experienced in renovation work. During the negotiations for the renovation contract, Goodman informed DDS that he was forming a corporation, in order to limit his personal liability. A contract was executed and John Goodman signed a contract as president of a corporation in formation. The DDS knew that the corporation was not yet existing and never agreed to look solely to it once it is formed. The contract required that the work be completed by 10/15 and contained an arbitration clause. Goodman subcontracted the work, but the work was not completed by agreed date and whatever was completed was of poor quality. On 11/1, after default, Goodman filed articles of incorporation and the license was issued the next day. DDS made five payments between 08/79 and 12/79. The first check contained Goodman's name and he struck it out. On 05/80, DDS demanded arbitration. The demand listed both the corporation and Goodman. Goodman moved for a stay of arbitration and an order dismissing him from the arbitration proceeding. The trial court entered an order dismissing Goodman, as an individual, from the arbitration.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.