Goodwin v. Agassiz, Ma Sup. Jud. Ct.,

283 Mass 358, 186 N.E. 659 (1933)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Agassiz (D) was president and one of the directors of the Cliff Mining Company, which had not been very productive. D and other insiders had received a geologist's report indicating a strong possibility that one of their properties contained major copper deposits. Goodwin (P), thinking exploratory operations for the company a bust, sold his stock on the open stock exchange and D bought it anonymously. Copper deposits were found, and the stock consequently increased in value. There was no communication between the parties. P would not have sold his stock if he had known of the geologist's theory. P alleged D breached his fiduciary duty as a director by not disclosing the information. The trial judge ruled that there was no fiduciary relation requiring disclosure by Ds to P before buying his stock in the manner in which they did. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.