This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ps entered into a 20-year lease with D effective August 15, 1991. Payments were to begin on June 15, 1992. D was also responsible for taxes and utilities. D was obligated to obtain permits and approvals for restaurant construction and operation. D could cancel if it was unable obtain the permits and approvals by February 15, 1992. D was to pay liquidated damages for breach of the lease. Local community and religious groups began an organized effort to oppose the construction and operation of a D restaurant at the subject location, and against fast-food establishments in the community generally. On February 10, 1992, D sent Ps a letter requesting alteration of the lease terms. D filed a permit application on February 14, 1992, and repudiated the lease by letter on the same date. Ps refused any modifications and repudiations. P sued D in June 1992 for past and future rent, and acceleration of all future rent due under the lease. D refused to pay. The judge granted Ps' motion for summary judgment. P and D agreed to a trial before the magistrate for damages. During trial, P testified that they had entered a new lease that included higher rental payments

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.