Gross v. Hanover Ins. Co.

138 F.R.D. 53 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Gross (P) has alleged the loss of $217,800 in diamonds consigned to 3-R Jewelers, and approximately $48,000 in diamonds and emeralds left by P at 3-R for safekeeping. 3-R was owned by Anthony Rizzo, who employed his brother Joseph. P made a claim to Hanover (D) for $75,000 total. The parties agree that the loss of the jewels was the result of a theft at the 3-R store. A witness testified to some extremely shady dealings wherein it was alleged that Joseph had conspired in the theft. Joseph’s story was entirely different but just as unbelievable in that he had left the front of the store to get a warranty card and the two men present took everything from the safe he had left open. D also claimed that Joseph was a cocaine addict. Anthony was aware of that fact but continued to employ Joseph. D’s third party complaint seeks to implead Joseph and Anthony on the grounds that they would be liable to D should D be found liable to P. D asserts a claim against Joseph for negligent handling as plaintiff’s consignee or bailee or as the agent of 3-R, a claim of conversion against Joseph and against Anthony for negligent hiring and retention and supervision of Joseph.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.