This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P owned and leased a farm to one Schrik under a written lease, which gave P 2/5 of the corn grown. Schrik gave a mortgage to D on his share of the crops. The mortgaged property was sold at auction by the bank with Schrik's permission. a crib of corn containing 393 bushels was sold by D to Johnson (D). Ps sued Ds for conversion. P testified, over the objection of hearsay and self-serving, that when Schrik was about through husking corn he was on the farm and Schrik pointed out the corn in question (and a double crib of corn) and said: 'Mr. Hanson, here is your corn for this year, this double crib here and this single crib here is your share for this year's corn; this belongs to you, Mr. Hanson.' A bystander was called and against the same objection testified to having heard the talk in substantially the same language. P got the verdict and Ds appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.