Harrington v. California

395 U.S. 250 (1969)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Harrington (D), Bosby, Rhone, and Cooper attempted to rob a store. D was white; the other three were black. Bosby shot a clerk, and the four fled the scene. Later, Bosby and Cooper confessed that a white man was present, but they did not testify at the joint trial of the four. D confessed that he was at the store at the time of the attempted robbery and fled with the other three. Rhone testified, claiming that D was present in the store with a gun at the time. D cross-examined Rhone about his prior confession. D was convicted under the felony murder rule. D appealed, claiming that his conviction was based in part on Bosby's and Cooper's confessions and that he had no chance to cross-examine them.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.