Harrington v. California

395 U.S. 250 (1969)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Harrington (D), Bosby, Rhone, and Cooper attempted to rob a store. D was white; the other three were black. Bosby shot a clerk, and the four fled the scene. Later, Bosby and Cooper confessed that a white man was present, but they did not testify at the joint trial of the four. D confessed that he was at the store at the time of the attempted robbery and fled with the other three. Rhone testified, claiming that D was present in the store with a gun at the time. D cross-examined Rhone about his prior confession. D was convicted under the felony murder rule. D appealed, claiming that his conviction was based in part on Bosby's and Cooper's confessions and that he had no chance to cross-examine them.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.