This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Harris (D) was a resident of North Carolina and was indebted to Balk (P) also a resident of North Carolina for $180. There was no written evidence of the obligation. Epstein, from Baltimore, asserted that P was indebted to him for $344 from the sale of general merchandise. D visited Baltimore for the purpose of purchasing merchandise and while in that city, Epstein got a court to issue a nonresident writ of attachment against D attaching the debt due from D to P. The sheriff got a hold of D and served him with the attachment papers. D left and returned home to North Carolina and made an affidavit that he owed P $180. Judgment was entered for Epstein and D paid that amount to Epstein's attorney. P then sued D for the $180 and D pled the action in Maryland as a bar to recovery. The trial court did not allow D's defense and entered judgment for P; the Maryland court did not have jurisdiction to attach or garnish the debt due from D to P because D was only temporarily in Maryland.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.