This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D was a witness before a grand jury and refused to answer certain questions on the ground of self-incrimination. D and the grand jury were brought before the District Court which directed him to answer the questions propounded before the grand jury, stating that D would receive immunity from prosecution. D refused and was again asked by the judge to answer, and he refused on the ground of privilege. P requested that D be found in contempt of court 'under Rule 42 (a).' D protested and requested an adjournment and a public hearing where he would be permitted to call witnesses. That motion was denied. D was adjudged guilty of criminal contempt, imposing a sentence of one year's imprisonment. The Court of Appeal affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.