Hart v. Wolff Alaska Sup. Ct.,

489 P.2d 114 (1971)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Hart (P) filed a defamation action against Wolff (D) for statements made about P's alleged misappropriation of funds in the formation of Arctic Bowl, Inc. P was the president of Arctic until Metropolitan Mortgage and Securities Co. purchased a controlling interest. P then became a manager who was employed by Metropolitan to handle its business in the area; P was also the controlling shareholder. D requested a court order for the production of the corporate records of Arctic. P refused, and the case was dismissed. P appealed; the superior court could not order the production of those records because the records were not in the possession, custody, or control of a party to the pending action.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.