Hart v. Wolff Alaska Sup. Ct.,

489 P.2d 114 (1971)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Hart (P) filed a defamation action against Wolff (D) for statements made about P's alleged misappropriation of funds in the formation of Arctic Bowl, Inc. P was the president of Arctic until Metropolitan Mortgage and Securities Co. purchased a controlling interest. P then became a manager who was employed by Metropolitan to handle its business in the area; P was also the controlling shareholder. D requested a court order for the production of the corporate records of Arctic. P refused, and the case was dismissed. P appealed; the superior court could not order the production of those records because the records were not in the possession, custody, or control of a party to the pending action.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.