Hassan, M.D. v. Independent Practice Associates, P.C.
698 F. Supp. 679 (1988)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Ps are allergists who practice through the Allergy & Asthma Center, P.C., a professional corporation. D is an organization of physicians and osteopaths who provide medical care to subscribers of Genesee Health Care, Inc., doing business as Health Plus of Michigan (Health Plus), a state-licensed, federally-qualified health maintenance organization (HMO). D is owned by the physicians who comprise the group. Health Plus, the HMO insurance contractor here, is funded by subscribers who pay a fixed premium per month. With this money, Health Plus pays service providers, such as D, on a computed basis and also a fixed amount per member per month. D members are paid primarily on a fee-for-service basis, which D determines according to a set maximum fee schedule. Health Plus will pay D physicians no more than what the fee schedule provides. D exists only to serve Health Plus patients. Health Plus' market share is 20 percent of the population in the area of Genesee - Lapeer - Shiawassee counties. In 1982, when P left D, Health Plus treated only about 8 percent of the area. Blue Cross applied to 65-70 percent of the third-party business in the three-county area. Health Plus must compete with other HMOs and insurers in providing health care coverage. There is no evidence that D physicians cannot also belong to other such organizations. The largest portion of Health Plus's membership is represented by General Motors (GM) employees. In order to obtain the GM business, D must compete on an annual basis by obtaining both GM and UAW approval as an authorized insurer and then, further, convince the employees to choose the Health Plus program. D maintains that as a result of the competition, they have lowered their rates since 1983, while simultaneously increasing the benefits. P joined D in 1979, and until October of 1981, they were the only allergy specialists to provide such service to Health Plus subscribers. In 1980, billing records revealed a high incidence of lab tests performed by P that prompted D's Care, Quality, and Cost Committee to request justification for those tests from P. The Committee began setting guidelines for allergy testing which prohibited routine testing. D also discovered that P performed far more tests than two other specialists, without justification. P was told to resign from D. Health Plus sent out a notice that subscribers could no longer see P. D claims that P's practice was already in decline as D's physicians had ceased referring non-Health Plus patients to P because of patient complaints as well as overuse of tests. D contends that referrals from non-IPA physicians declined almost as fast as referrals from D physicians. In August of 1983, P applied for readmission to D on behalf of their newly established Urgent Care Family Clinic to provide emergency care to D members. P's application was denied without explanation. P's Clinic lost money and, in 1985, it was closed. P sued D alleging that D's reimbursement system violates § 1 of the Sherman Act's prohibition against horizontal agreements among competitors to fix prices. P maintains that D established a schedule of fees for services to which its competitor/members agreed to adhere and this is a per se violation of Section 1. D moved for summary judgment.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner