This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Charles (P) filed suit against his uncle George (D) on grounds of waste in that D failed to pay the real estate taxes due on his life estate on property that P had a remainder interest in. P asked for a declaration of rights, an order directing future payments and reimbursement for his payment of the taxes. P alleged that D's failure was intentional as part of scheme to have D's stepson purchase the property at tax sale. D filed a counterclaim alleging that P had not repaid a loan of $5,000 on an unwritten agreement. D also claimed that P owed him additional monies for rental and storage of personal property on the land in issue. D got the life estate on the property and proposed a plan to P to purchase P's interest in the property by putting money in escrow and then allowing the land to pass through a tax sale. P refused and then D acting on advice of his attorney did not pay the real estate taxes. The premises were subjected to tax sale, and prior to the sale, D's 19-year-old stepson arranged to purchase the premises at the sale. This was done by a shill, a secretary at the firm of D's lawyer. D sent P a letter terminating his use of the premises and demanding $5 per day rental for P's personal property thereon. P then redeemed the premises for $893.18. P got the verdicts of $1,671.20 and interest on count I and $7,500 in punitive damages on count II. The court then found for D on his $5,000 loan claim but not for the rental claim. P appealed; the $5,000 verdict was against the weight of the evidence and for the trial court's failure to enter the injunction. D cross-appealed on all issues.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.