Healy v. White
173 Conn. 438 (1977)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P, then seven and a half years old, was riding as a passenger in an automobile operated by his mother. Their automobile was struck by a tractor-trailer truck owned by the defendant Silliman Company and operated by its employee, D. P, then seven and a half years old, was riding as a passenger in an automobile operated by his mother. Their automobile was struck by a tractor-trailer truck owned by the defendant Silliman Company and operated by its employee, D. P sued D. Summary judgment on liability was rendered against Ds. Damages were addressed, and P claimed that he had been violently thrown from his car and had suffered various physical injuries which included the 'aggravation and worsening of a specific learning disability' and resulted in a 'permanent minimal brain dysfunction syndrome [brain damage] with associated multiple psychomotor seizures [permanent epilepsy].' It was also alleged that P had incurred and would in the future incur expenses for hospitalization, physicians' care, and other medical needs, as well as expenses for private tutors and teaching specialists. The jury returned a verdict of $410,000, and Ds appealed. Ds dispute the claims of minimal brain dysfunction and epilepsy.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner