Heino v. Harper

759 P.2d 253 (1988)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

W was riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by H. H turned left into the path of an oncoming automobile driven by Harper (D). W was injured in the collision. W filed a complaint against H for failing to keep a proper lookout, in failing to keep his automobile under proper control, and in failing to yield the right-of-way. H asserted the defense of interspousal immunity and filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court entered final judgment in H's favor. The Court of Appeals affirmed. W appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.