Heino v. Harper

759 P.2d 253 (1988)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

W was riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by H. H turned left into the path of an oncoming automobile driven by Harper (D). W was injured in the collision. W filed a complaint against H for failing to keep a proper lookout, in failing to keep his automobile under proper control, and in failing to yield the right-of-way. H asserted the defense of interspousal immunity and filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court entered final judgment in H's favor. The Court of Appeals affirmed. W appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.