Hellriegel v. Tholl
417 P.2d 362 (1966)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P's teenage son, was seriously injured when Ds, three of his friends, tried to throw him into Lake Washington during an afternoon spent in water-skiing, sunbathing, and engaging in horseplay. P sued in his own behalf for recovery of the cost of the medical care for his son, and sued in his son's behalf for the loss of income and for the temporary total disability and the alleged permanent partial disability, as well as for general damages for the alleged negligence and recklessness by which his son was harmed. Before trial, the complaint was amended by changing the grounds of the liability from negligence and recklessness to that of battery. The trial court granted a nonsuit in that there was evidence that P’s son had consented to the acts and that the final result was an accident and not a battery.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner