Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.

113 P.2d 438 (1941)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D is a corporation engaged in retailing. D maintains an optical department. Ds without P's knowledge or consent signed his name to the following telegram to the governor urging the veto of a bill. The bill would have prevented D from continuing to engage in the business of fitting and selling optical glasses to the public. P is also a Classified Civil Service Employee of the United States Government. He is prohibited from engaging in political activities. P claims that Ds' jeopardized P's position and his right to receive a pension upon reaching the age of retirement. P sued Ds alleging mental anguish. P sought $20,000, of which the sum of $10,000 is punitive damages. D demurred, and the trial court sustained, and P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.