Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.

113 P.2d 438 (1941)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D is a corporation engaged in retailing. D maintains an optical department. Ds without P's knowledge or consent signed his name to the following telegram to the governor urging the veto of a bill. The bill would have prevented D from continuing to engage in the business of fitting and selling optical glasses to the public. P is also a Classified Civil Service Employee of the United States Government. He is prohibited from engaging in political activities. P claims that Ds' jeopardized P's position and his right to receive a pension upon reaching the age of retirement. P sued Ds alleging mental anguish. P sought $20,000, of which the sum of $10,000 is punitive damages. D demurred, and the trial court sustained, and P appealed.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.