Hoddeson v. Koos Bros.
135 A.2d 702 (1957)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Hoddeson (P) wanted to buy furniture from Koos (D). A salesman she met at the store confirmed her selections and calculated the price to be $168.50. P handed the salesman the cash. P was then informed that the articles other than those on display were not in stock and that they could be delivered in September, just a few weeks from then. P got a receipt for her cash. P went home and waited for delivery. It did not come, and she inquired at D but learned that there was no record of her sale. P sued D and won at the lower court. P was unable to recognize from D’s regular employees who actually waited on her and took her money. D contended at trial that the person who waited upon P was an imposter, which was done without D’s knowledge. D appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner