This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Howard Schultz (P) hired Broniec (D) to audit accounts under an employment agreement, whereby D agreed to a noncompete clause that forbade D from competing with P, directly or indirectly, as principal, agent, employer or employee, in any capacity, in a business which would be in competition with P. That covenant was to last for two years after termination and would apply to all territories where P operated. D terminated employment and P sought to enforce the covenant by injunction. P's suit was dismissed; the clause was unenforceable because it was overbroad. P appealed; the court should rewrite the clause to create a valid restriction.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.