Hunt v. Ohio Dept. Of Rehabilitation & Correction

696 N.E.2d 674 (1997)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P was an inmate in the custody and control of D. P was operating a Gravely snowblower while working with the outside yard crew. The chute became clogged with snow. P put the snowblower in neutral and turned the 'Power Take Off' ('PTO') switch to the 'off' position. The PTO switch shut down the blower. After visually inspecting the chute, P inserted her hand inside the chute and began cleaning out the packed snow. As she was removing the snow, the machine caught P's gloved hand and started pulling it into the chute. Although her glove remained caught in the chute, and plaintiff was able to pull her hand out, her right index, middle and third fingers were partially severed. The head of the maintenance department had instructed Officer Jenkins, in charge of P, that if the chute became clogged, to push the PTO switch in, turn the power switch off with the key, and clean out the snow with water or some device. The Officer was cautioned against placing one's hand down the chute. P sued D and alleges that D negligently instructed and trained her to operate a snowblower and that she was not provided with supervision while she was operating the snowblower. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.