This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P alleged that D had forged and falsely notarized a client's signature. D failed to answer the petition. In June 1984, D forged or procured the forgery of his client's signature on a petition for dissolution of marriage and on an application for temporary relief. He then notarized the documents, presented them to a judge, and ultimately had them served on the opposing party.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.