This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Reed (D) filed a petition for an order for relief under Chapter 7. Two weeks preceding the filing D engaged in prebankruptcy planning and sold nonexempt personal property for approximately 50% of the value which they had assigned to those properties and applied the proceeds of $34,500.00 towards the liquidation of liens against their residence homestead. The trustee (P) filed a complaint challenging entitlement to the exemptions. D had collected approximately 35 guns. On a financial statement dated April 1, 1979, he had valued the gun collection at $20,000.00. On December 11, 1979, ten days prior to filing the petition in bankruptcy, he sold the entire gun collection to a friend, Steve Gallagher, for $5,000.00 cash. On the April 1, 1979, financial statement he had valued his antiques at $3,000.00. Three months later, in August 1979, D purchased additional antiques from an estate for $11,000.00. In late November 1979, he sold three items from the antique collection to an acquaintance, Charles Tharpe, for $3,500.00, applying the proceeds to the payment of a note to Bank of the West. On December 11, 1979, he sold the remaining antiques to the friend, Steve Gallagher for $ 5,000.00 cash. One month prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings, D purchased for $15,000.00 an interest in a corporation with the intriguing name of Triple BS Corporation. He sold that interest to the friend, Steve Gallagher, on December 11, 1979, for $5,000.00 cash. In three separate transactions between October 5, 1979, and November 13, 1979, D purchased gold coins -for the total sum of $22,115.00. On or about December 10, 1979, he sold those coins for $19,500.00 cash. Ten days prior to bankruptcy D sold nonexempt assets with an aggregate value of $ 68,500.00 receiving as proceeds the sum of $ 34,500.00. On December 11, 1979, $19,892.00 from the proceeds of the sale of nonexempt assets were applied to pay off a home improvement loan. The balance of $ 15,000.00 was applied towards the lien note against the residence, reducing the balance of that note to approximately $ 28,000.00. P insists that the homestead exemption on the residence should be avoided, because of the flagrant prebankruptcy planning in which D engaged. P claims fraudulent intent is shown by D receiving less than a reasonably equivalent value for the assets. In his defense D cites a comment in the legislative history following § 522(b): 'As under current law, the debtor will be permitted to convert nonexempted property into exempt property before filing a bankruptcy petition. See Hearings, pt. 3, at 1355-58. The practice is not fraudulent as to creditors, and permits the debtor to make full use of the exemptions to which he is entitled under the law.'

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.