This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P filed an application for cold fusion. The examiner rejected the application as P failed to submit evidence of utility and that cold fusion results were reproducible under §101. P appealed and the PTO affirmed in that P had not rebutted or refuted the examiner’s determination. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.