This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P suffered a severe adverse reaction to anesthesia she received during surgery. P died. P sued the Ds alleging malpractice. P alleged that D had committed malpractice by failing to 'pre-oxygenate' P. The trial court granted D's' motion in limine to prevent P from cross-examining D's medical expert, Dr. Caplan, about whether he, personally, would have pre- oxygenated P. The jury found in favor of D and P appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and this appeal resulted.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.