Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P suffered a severe adverse reaction to anesthesia she received during surgery. P died. P sued the Ds alleging malpractice. P alleged that D had committed malpractice by failing to 'pre-oxygenate' P. The trial court granted D's' motion in limine to prevent P from cross-examining D's medical expert, Dr. Caplan, about whether he, personally, would have pre- oxygenated P. The jury found in favor of D and P appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and this appeal resulted.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.