Judd v. Drezg

103 P.3d 135 (2004)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Athan Montgomery was born with severe brain damage as a result of D's incompetence in his failed attempt to deliver Athan with the use of forceps. P sued D. The jury awarded Athan $22,735.30 for amounts already expended to maintain his life, and $1,000,000 as the amount necessary to maintain his life during his expected--although shortened--lifespan. The jury also awarded Athan $1,250,000 of so-called 'noneconomic' damages in recognition of the difference between a life as a normal, healthy boy, and a life as he must now live it: severely brain damaged, with drastically reduced life experiences and expectations. In 1986, the legislature enacted a statutory limitation on some forms of damages recoverable by victims of medical malpractice actions. The statute applies only to those who have sustained over $250,000 in damages. The trial court reduced the jury's award to $250,000. P appealed. D argues that the trial court correctly reduced Athan's quality of life damages based on the statutory cap.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.