Justices Of Appellate Division v. Erdmann

301 N.E.2d 426 (1973)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D was found guilty of professional misconduct and censured. The charge was based on an article which appeared in Life Magazine by D that criticized the judges and said 'They're whores who have become madams...I would like to be a judge...but I don't know the going price.' This appeal resulted.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.