Justices Of Appellate Division v. Erdmann
301 N.E.2d 426 (1973)
Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D was found guilty of professional misconduct and censured. The charge was based on an article which appeared in Life Magazine by D that criticized the judges and said 'They're whores who have become madams...I would like to be a judge...but I don't know the going price.' This appeal resulted.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner