Kastner v. Toombs

611 P.2d 62 (1980)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Clearwater Drilling Company was drilling a well and setting a water line. P had been employed by Clearwater to lay pipe for the water line. Clearwater leased a backhoe from D in order to excavate the ditch for the water line. D furnished the backhoe operator, Albert Malcom. Malcom began to dig to a depth of five feet but was informed that the Club wanted it six feet deep. Malcom warned that the soil was soft and might cave in, but was instructed to go ahead and deepen the trench anyway. Malcom suggested 'belling' the sides of the ditch. That advice was ignored. The ditch did cave in injuring Kastner. P sued D claiming that it was vicariously liable for Malcom's negligence. D moved for summary judgment on the ground that Malcom was a borrowed servant working for Clearwater at the time of the accident. The superior court granted the motion. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.